Monday, April 09, 2007

A Day in the Aftermath...


of the Blog Against Theocracy. I have to be honest. I can't let go. I'm obsessed. I keep checking for updates, reading more, checking back to see if a blogger I particularly liked has posted any more.
But I need to! I need to take a minute to be peaceful instead of outraged. To be grateful instead of dismayed. To be hopeful instead of defeated.
Because I don't know about the rest of you, but for every link that led me to something wonderful; something poetic, eloquent, heartfelt, outraged, worried, insightful... There were references or links to bits of absolute, devastating horror.

I wanna be an ostrich again!! Waaaaahhhhhhhh!!!


But I can't. I can't just go back to burying my head in the sand with my hiney in the air (with a big round target pasted on it).
Still, my spirit won't thrive under the impact of this new and deeper understanding I have, unless I can find a balance. It will shrivel and wilt and I'll become angry and bitter and cynical.

Yes, my Athiest friends, I said and mean Spirit. Whether one considers it divine or merely a product of molecular energy, there is no doubt in my mind that each of us is a human vessel (for/of/with?) containing this spark. As is every other living entity. (yup, right down to bugs n bacteria).
For me it is the spark that connects us all; the Good the Bad and the Ugly. (Love old Spaghetti Westerns...sorry!). It's what connects us not only to one another, but to nature and the earth and ultimately the Universe.

So to me creating a balance means I need to outwardly stay aware, informed and active, while inwardly remaining positive, hopeful and grateful.

I had a few more frightening links I was going to post today, but instead I think I'll be hopeful and post this link to What I Learned About Christianity From The Druids.
(Via SA. Thanks!!)
The author opens with the following:
This article is the result of research that I have been conducting on the revival of Druidry in Western society. While Christianity has much to offer the world, it is often thought of as a force of suppression or, at best, of social control. I think that it is important for us, as we discuss emerging theology, to be open to criticism from other religions. Here, I present simply one religious expression’s view of Christianity and draw some lessons that we as Christians can learn. I hope this will generate some beneficial discussion for us.

Now I know some folks will choose to see this as a christian who is seeking to "know thine enemy", but just for today, I'm going to choose hope. I'm going to choose to believe that this is not "Spin", but rather a sincere attempt of one theologist to discern and perhaps amend flaws in the christian perspective in a positive way which would perhaps change our perspective of christianity.

The article concludes with the following:

This current research is suggesting that a voice, not simply from Christian others, but from religious others needs to also be heard in order to address the contemporary perception of Christianity. That perception, whether correct or not, is increasingly considered mainstream. This paper has raised the criticism by contemporary practitioners of Druidry. Understanding their perception of Christianity will aid in enriching the Christian life. If Christians hear the criticism, doors of dialogue can open and lead to deeper appreciation and respect. By listening and responding to the criticism, the Christian voice might gain credibility.

Hope is good
.

I'm gonna take a walk outside now around this beautiful desert landscape in which I'm privileged to live. I'm gonna check out the budding green on my Empress tree. I'm gonna see if there's any asparagus ready to cut. I might even pull a few weeds. I think I'll take along one of my birds. Kisses, My Sulfur Crested Cockatoo, because he loves the wind in his feathers. He's an amazing being who delights in his world. I'm gonna take my cue from him, today.

Labels: , , , ,

3rd and Final Official BAT Post or...

What's in your Playlist???


Okay, so I'm late. Fuck that!! In Thorne's world, today's not over until I wake up tomorrow. Thank you for an incredible ride, BlueGal, Neural Gourmet, Talk2Action and Mock, Paper, Scissors!

Wow!!! BlueGal you are amazing!!! I wanna do a shout out to First Freedom First. THANK YOU!!!!

Oh, ow. Man, I'm wiped out. A little tense. I think it's time for some....tunes. Ahhh... (dammit, where's the lube?) music. Yeahhhh.... Hmmmm... That's better. Tonite's playlist has got to be the blues. Stevie ray Vaughn, Candye Kane, Johnny Lang and ahhhh Eric Clapton, Thass right. A lil slooooow haaaand...

Hmmm. Where was I?! Right! Blogswarm. So I started my day with this:
Universal Declaration of Human Rights
Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948

On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."


Article 16.

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.

(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.

(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled
to protection by society and the State.



Where the fuck does it say anything about the gender of these people?? NOWHERE!!!! Even "spouses" refers to them without use of a gender specific pronoun. Nor is there a definition of what constitutes a "family"

In a true DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS these terms would be left intentionally undefined, to leave room for growth, change!! This document was created to protect ALL OF US!!! We could do lots worse than adopting a declaration such as this for our own. Uh... wait a minute. We already are doing far worse than this...uh; ummm - you know what I mean
*pant, pant, pant* Oh, my. This shit wears me out.

Ahhh. No, really. That panting was from getting all worked up - I mean pissed off- earlier. (It had nothing to do with my newest iPod accessory. Cross... my... heart).

Then I found this sorrowful and succinct summary of the State of The Union entitled This could have been a beautiful place.

I found This article which was not directly part of BAT, but was cited in this excellent submission by No More Mr Nice Guy The first article is a permanent bookmark in my references file.

I was kinda wondering on n off throughout the weekend if this apparent surge of RRF Dominism is like the whole sky is falling, Y2K, End of a Millenium panic that comes 'round in reasonably predictable cycles. I was happy to get a whole shitload of history about this from Jeff Sharlet in Harpers, who tells us that: We don’t like to consider the possibility that they are not newcomers to power but returnees, that the revivals that have been sweeping America with generational regularity since its inception are not flare-ups but the natural temperature of the nation.
Not to minimize the threat in the least; a well researched article worthy of serious consideration.


Then I wandered rapturously through the blogswarm pausing to play with Balls and...Walnuts!!!
My comment:
This was a great article, but the comments and your continued interaction with them really made it for me. I especially love your anonymous friend's rant. Although I've never been (even by the furthest stretch of the imagination) a christian, I have to admit that the whole idea of the rapture and Armageddon has always appealed to me in a perverted sort of way. I dunno... maybe I read too much survivor type science fiction as a kid. Ray Bradbury, Robert Heinlein. I always kinda wished those rapturous freaks would disappear, body and all (so we "left behind"-ers wouldn't have to deal with the bodies and general clean up.) One particularly vehement rapture-ist once informed me that I specifically, would be in the direct employ of satan in the endtimes. As a tattoo artist, I would be in high demand to mark everyone with the number of the beast. Ha-ha. Now, that's what I call job security!!! Really, though... all seriousness aside. I think it might be kinda cool to rebuild without all those religious zealots. Who knows what we might achieve in the aftermath of a global abortion. I think Big Mama (aka Mother earth) is getting pretty tired of this crap, anyway. I mean; check out the bees.

After a bout of coitus interruptus, caused by an insane video game for good christian kids that made me eat my words about wanting to live in a post-apocalyptic world and almost blew my whole sexy innuendo thing I got goin' here...

(Thank god[dess] for science. I mean, who woulda thunk there could be so many cool accessories for an iPod??)

Anyway I went from Balls to RamboJesus. Oh my!! Now this is a Jesus I could go for... (oops! there's that damn lesbian "dick tooth" [in the immortal words of Margaret Cho], again) Stopped by the Chocolate Jesus because a "dick tooth" is one thing, but a "sweet dick" tooth??!! Mmmm. (Melts in your mouth, etcetera and so on.

Ohhhhh.... Mmmmmmm.... Ahhhhhhh....

and finally ended up at Cycle A man shaped by religious neglect of his poor lonely penis who hilariously brings us Jesus Boobies! ( Boobsalot, boobsalot, I like boobsalot... It's true (oh, it's true) I'm with you, Cycle!!

Oh!! Uh - huh. Ungggghhh. There. Whew. Mmmm hmmmmm.... *sigh*
Much better. I think I can go to sleep now.

Oh, yeah. Here's a small sample of my playlist.

Aerosmith
Alanis
Big & Rich
Bread
Bruddah Waltah
Candye Kane
Clint Black
Dave Matthews
Dixie Chicks
Elton John
Eric Clapton
Evanescence
Fiona Apple
Flyleaf
Grand Funk
Hoobastank
Indigo Girls
Joe Cocker
Johnny Lang
Kitaro
KD Lang
KT Tunstall
Limp Bizkit
Little Feat
Marilyn Manson
Melissa Etheridge
Molly Hatchet
Mozart
Natalie Merchant
Nickelback
Pavarotti
REM
Social Distortion
Stevie Ray Vaughn
Toni Childs
Van Morrison
Vivaldi


Tell ya what. Don't fuck with my music, and I won't fuck with yours. Amen, hallelujah.
Peace out.

Labels: , , , ,

Saturday, April 07, 2007

Blog Against Theocracy, Day 2

Marriage. NOT Gay Marriage necessarily, but Marriage as a Legal Contract


I've been giving this whole Gay marriage topic alot of thought for a long time. Back when I was happily married to a man who I loved with all my heart, I supported the rights of gays to marry. He died in 1998 and now that I am living with my other soul mate, who is a woman, like me. These days I'm giving it even more thought and in different ways.

Whether everyone really realizes it or not there are alot of different takes on this subject even within the LGBT community. There is a large faction that would happily settle for a "Civil Union" which allows us all the rights and responsibilities of a straight marriage. Alot of these folks feel that we don't need to imitate the straight lifestyle, and that marriage for gays somehow betrays the gay lifestyle. (I could go into a whole thing on so-called lifestyles, but I would go soooo far off topic!!)
Then there's the folks who want the same rights as everybody else, no matter what! As for me, I can respect both positions. I see merit in both arguments, just as I see flaws. My take on the topic of Gay Marriage is this:
Nobody should be legally "married"
.
That's right; nobody. Marriage is a religious ceremony/institution/ritual/law. As soon as it became a part of state and federal legislation, the wall between the separation of church and state was crossed. Period. Marriage as a legal, binding, contract should never have been. I say, forget promoting gay marriage. Let's cut straight to the heart of the matter and abolish legal marriage. Really!! Let's instead push for legislation that truly separates church and state in this area, at least. Let's admit that the better solution would be to admit that "marriage" is a religious term applied to a government filing of two people entering into a personal, domestic, contract.
A civil union, as opposed to a business partnership.
Because that is what it is.
If you want to go into a business partnership with so and so, you draw up a contract, have it notarized and then file the appropriate papers with the courts.
Same with a pre-nup. Isn't a pre-nup just an additional filing attached to the so - called "marriage contract", made to further protect one party of the "partnership"?
Let's just let marriage be what it was intended to be; a religious ceremony in which the rules vary from religion to religion.
If we are to truly separate church and state, then nobody should be married under law. Let all those straight folks go down to the courthouse and file their "domestic partnership" or "civil union" papers just like everybody else.


Be sure to stop by Blog Against Theocracy to check out all the great bloggers that are participating in this event and speaking out about the separation of Church and State, and don't forget after the event is over to get continuing info and updates on the struggle at Freedom First

Powered by ScribeFire.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, April 06, 2007

Blog Against Theocracy Day 1

I’ve been goin’ a little crazy with this whole idea ever since I first came across it. Not that these kinds of issues aren’t in my fucking face and life every day... they are. As a woman, a lesbian, a witch - as an American, that’s right, I said it - an American, I’m constantly blown away by how much and how completely the intent if not the letter of our Constitution has been undermined by religion. And worse, how we seem to be going backward under the current administration of the Georgie Puppet, ventriloquism dummy for the Radical Right Christian Fundimaentalists, (and big money and oil and special interests in general. But that’s a-whole-nother rant!!).
So here’s my chance to speak out. Not just by signing petitions and supporting causes or wearing T-shirts... to really make a difference. Well, I don’t know about that, but at least I have the opportunity to write about something that matters. Sorry kids, no sandbox today.
I’ve had several ideas (among the myriad to choose from) for topics and I’m going to elaborate on a couple of them in the next two days, but for today I’m just going to post some quotes from a couple of our Founding Fathers on the topic of separation of Church and State, (snagged from AltLiberal’s Comments at Clipmarks), and take it from there.

Thomas Jefferson

I concur with you strictly in your opinion of the comparative merits of atheism and demonism, and really see nothing but the latter in the being worshipped by many who think themselves Christians.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Richard Price, Jan. 8, 1789 (Richard Price had written to TJ on Oct. 26. about the harm done by religion and wrote "Would not Society be better without Such religions? Is Atheism less pernicious than Demonism?")

I never submitted the whole system of my opinions to the creed of any party of men whatever in religion, in philosophy, in politics, or in anything else where I was capable of thinking for myself. Such an addiction is the last degradation of a free and moral agent.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Francis Hopkinson, March 13, 1789


History, I believe, furnishes no example of a priest-ridden people maintaining a free civil government. This marks the lowest grade of ignorance of which their civil as well as religious leaders will always avail themselves for their own purposes.
-Thomas Jefferson to Alexander von Humboldt, Dec. 6, 1813.


Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to Dr. Thomas Cooper, February 10, 1814

On the Bible:

Among the sayings and discourses imputed to him [Jesus] by his biographers, I find many passages of fine imagination, correct morality, and of the most lovely benevolence; and others again of so much ignorance, so much absurdity, so much untruth, charlatanism, and imposture, as to pronounce it impossible that such contradictions should have proceeded from the same being.
-Thomas Jefferson, letter to William Short, April 13, 1820


Let’s not forget that pesky letter to the Danbury Baptist Church:

Gentlemen
The affectionate sentiments of esteem and approbation which you are so good as to express towards me, on behalf of the Danbury Baptist association, give me the highest satisfaction. my duties dictate a faithful and zealous pursuit of the interests of my constituents, & in proportion as they are persuaded of my fidelity to those duties, the discharge of them becomes more and more pleasing.
Believing with you that religion is a matter which lies solely between Man & his God, that he owes account to none other for his faith or his worship, that the legitimate powers of government reach actions only, & not opinions, I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should "make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," thus building a wall of separation between Church & State. Adhering to this expression of the supreme will of the nation in behalf of the rights of conscience, I shall see with sincere satisfaction the progress of those sentiments which tend to restore to man all his natural rights, convinced he has no natural right in opposition to his social duties.
I reciprocate your kind prayers for the protection & blessing of the common father and creator of man, and tender you for yourselves & your religious association, assurances of my high respect & esteem.
Th Jefferson
Jan. 1. 1802.

James Madison

And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together.
- James Madison, letter to Edward Livingston, July 10, 1822, in Saul K Padover, ed., The Complete Madison: His Basic Writings (1953), also; from Jack N Rakove, ed., James Madison: Writings, (1999), p. 789, quoted from Ed and Michael Buckner, "Quotations that Support the Separation of State and Church"

The civil government ... functions with complete success ... by the total separation of the Church from the State.
- James Madison, 1819, Writings, 8:432, quoted from Gene Garman, "Essays In Addition to America's Real Religion"

The only ultimate protection for religious liberty in a country like ours, Madison pointed out--echoing Jefferson;--is public opinion: a firm and pervading opinion that the First Amendment works. "Every new & successful example therefore of a perfect separation between ecclesiastical and civil matters, is of importance."
(Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, p. 56. Madison's words, according to Gaustad, are from his letter of 10 July 1822 to Edward Livingston.)


Religious bondage shackles and debilitates the mind and unfits it for every noble enterprize [sic], every expanded prospect.Link
(James Madison, in a letter to William Bradford, April 1, 1774, as quoted by Edwin S. Gaustad, Faith of Our Fathers: Religion and the New Nation, San Francisco: Harper & Row, 1987, p. 37.)

'Nuff said!!

PS
Be sure to stop by Blog Against Theocracy to check out all the great bloggers that are participating in this event and speaking out about the separation of Church and State, and don't forget after the event is over to get continuing info and updates on the struggle at Freedom First

Labels: , , ,